How to Write a Grade-A Writing Essay

<h1>How to Write a Grade-A Writing Essay</h1><p>Have you at any point contemplated composing a Gone With the Wind article? In the event that you resemble the vast majority, you've most likely pondered whether there are any exposition subjects that work out positively for the rich artistic legacy of this exemplary novel.</p><p></p><p>The truth is that these articles are quite often reviewed on a level, which is the reason numerous understudies request that how compose an evaluation A paper. The vast majority underestimate that Gone With the Wind papers would be amazingly troublesome, and commonly, that supposition that is right.</p><p></p><p>Fortunately, there are a couple of article points that can be utilized to show understudies how to excel on the end of the year test. This is incredible news for a great deal of understudies since it makes it simple to concentrate on what they have to do on the test. The accompanyin g paper subjects are magnificent assets for understudies who are attempting to be prepared for the test.</p><p></p><p>Huckleberry Finn is considered by numerous individuals to be one of the best American writing, and it has solid character and topic in the entirety of the accounts. The numerous stories composed by Mark Twain incorporated any semblance of 'The Adventures of Tom Sawyer,' 'The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,' and 'What Price Glory?' These are only a couple of instances of Huckleberry Finn paper points. Understudies ought to have the option to utilize these accounts as instances of subjects that will assist them with the essay.</p><p></p><p>Gone With the Wind was initially distributed over four decades prior, and it is a rich wellspring of points for some articles. A great deal of books have been expounded on the book and it tends to be hard to isolate fiction from truth. Having a duplicate of the book will assist understu dies with seeing the rich scholarly legacy of the book, and how to compose an article utilizing a portion of its themes.</p><p></p><p>The characters of this book were established upon blending reality and fiction, and the journalists were sufficiently intense to attempt to place a solid philosophical style into their works. For instance, Robert E. Lee is viewed as one of the most lovely commanders of the Civil War, yet commonly, he is depicted as just being a 'resentful old fogy.' Having this data about the character will assist understudies with making an additionally intriguing exposition, one that presents the two sides of the argument.</p><p></p><p>One thing that can be contrasted with what occurred in the Civil War is subjection. During this time, not all Americans were energetic about this subject, so the administration found a way to build up an arrangement of bondage all through the United States. It was extremely fruitful from the outset, however it was in the long run canceled in 1861.</p><p></p><p>Gone With the Wind paper points and different well known works from history can assist understudies with understanding a universe of rich culture and detail. For some understudies, the most significant piece of the entire test is the last assessment. All understudies need to be readied, and by showing them how to be comfortable with the distinctive article subjects, they can get ready for the end of the year test better.</p>

Sedimentary Petrogenesis Research Paper Topics

<h1>Sedimentary Petrogenesis Research Paper Topics</h1><p>For an understudy searching for a fun and fascinating exploration paper theme, sedimentary petrogenesis is an intriguing decision. Coming up next are some sedimentary petrogenesis explore paper themes that understudies can consider when they pick their examination paper topic.</p><p></p><p>All understudies searching for sedimentary petrogenesis look into paper points will make some hard memories discovering whatever can be considered as being in a similar classification as different instances of research papers. While this is valid, the subjects of this subject are very assorted and can accordingly be a decent determination for a progressively diverse kind of research paper. One extraordinary case of a sedimentary petrogenesis investigate paper is this one.</p><p></p><p>This explore paper takes a gander at a one of a kind zone of sedimentary petrogenesis inquire about. This paper has a wide range of themes and research addresses that all merit considering and furthermore covers what sorts of sedimentary petrogenesis procedures may happen in the maritime environment.</p><p></p><p>This paper takes a gander at three primary sedimentary petrogenesis forms, every one of which can have a date go for event and in what timeframe, and afterward it asks how they would change on the off chance that they happened simultaneously, or at an alternate time. It additionally considers a couple of obscure variables that could affect these procedures, including temperature and water science, which could prompt various qualities and dates.</p><p></p><p>This paper takes a gander at how a marine living being and species coral may contrast. The paper proposes that a ton of consideration ought to be given to the way that various species look, on the grounds that the presence of a specific types of coral can help deci de the age of a specific stone or soil. It additionally specifies that a paper ought to remember a remark for how various types of coral and fish look, however that it isn't really important to clarify how this contrasts from another types of coral and fish, nor do you need to clarify precisely why various species look the way they do.</p><p></p><p>One significant motivation behind why this sedimentary petrogenesis investigate paper is so fascinating is on the grounds that it has been recently distributed in a dark diary. In the event that an understudy needs to become familiar with this point, it is prescribed that they go to a web search tool and search for it utilizing the term 'sedimentary petrogenesis'.</p><p></p><p>As is frequently the situation, some online diaries are more rumored than others, and it is suggested that understudies searching for a sedimentary petrogenesis look into paper should look at any rate three diaries bef ore picking a theme. Despite the fact that this point isn't typically accessible in a few of the online diaries, it is constantly a smart thought to present a paper to in any event one diary, particularly if the paper is very much looked into and contains something beyond one question.</p><p></p><p>Overall, there are numerous acceptable sedimentary petrogenesis explore paper subjects to browse. Understudies should initially consider the sort of venture that they need to embrace before they pick a subject, as there are many fascinating sedimentary petrogenesis examine paper themes that are worth considering.</p>

Legal Opinion Research Paper - 3025 Words

Simple OHS Company v Workplace Safety Australia Pty Ltd (Research Paper Sample) Content: Legal opinionNameInstitutionSimple OHS Company v Workplace Safety Australia Pty LtdLegal OpinionA Brief set of FactsThe dispute at hand arose from the following series of facts. On 23 September 2013, an agreement was entered into between Workplace Safety Australia Pty Limited and Simple OHS Solutions Pty Ltd. The subject of the agreement was that, Simple was tasked to be the distributor of OHS compliance software license in Victoria and Tasmania. Under the said agreement, there clause 5.4 schedule 1 and 2 required Simple company to provide at least fifteen new customers every month for the 6 month duration failure to which would leave the option of termination at the behest of the supplier.However, in light of this agreement, prior to execution of the agreement, Ms. Shelley, an official representative of Workplace Safety Australia Ltd suggested to MS. Marini, a correspondent from Simple Company that she understood that in the startup process it would be hard to meet sales targets and that WSA would not expect them to meet the obligation in the initial stages of the agreement. Despite there being no finite time attached to this statement, on 26th March 2014, WSA sent a letter of termination to Simple Company.Whether Simple can rely on MS. Shelleyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s StatementOral ContractFor the oral statements or negotiations to form a cornerstone of this suit, they have to be admissible in court. Under Common law, the general rule is that once a contract has been reduced into writing, then oral evidence cannot be admitted to add, alter or make a contradiction to the written document. Therefore, the only terms of then contract permissible are those within the four corners of the document. However, this rule is not absolute. It could be circumvented if it is proven that the following circumstances apply.[Whincup, M. H. Contract law and practice: The English system, with Scottish, Commonwealth, and Continental comparisons. (Kluwer Law International, 2006 ) 162.] [McKendrick, E. Contract law: Text, cases, and materials. (Oxford University Press, 2010) 227.] 1 If not all the terms have been reduced to writing as agreed by the two parties 2 When the validity of the contract has been challenged. This happens if there is presence of vitiating elements of a contract such as misrepresentation, fraud, illegality, mistake or lack of consideration 3 If the contract is silent on a concept for which oral evidence would suitably fill the gap. In this case oral evidence may not contradict whatever is in written form but instead supplement it. 4 In contracts where there is no condition subsequent 5 If the courts would like to know more information about the meaning of various usages.From the above concept, it would be plausible to invoke argument (1) and (2) to support the admission of the oral conversation between Ms. Shelley and Ms. Marini. This is because, Simple Company can safely argue that the option of not enforcing the clause at the start of the contract was inadvertently omitted from the final document even though it merited being included. In the second sense, as we shall see later, the existence of this contract will be put into question considering that it can be successfully argued that the contract was only entered into pursuant to a misrepresentation by Workplace Safety Australia Company.In as much as Simple Company concedes that it never met the sales targets for a period of six months, it further contests the actions of Workplace Safety Australia to terminate the contract. In a bid to establish whether Simple OHS Solutions might have a legitimate claim in court to support their actions a number of issues have to be evaluated.Agency RelationshipThe substratum of any suit filed by Simple Company will always be the conversation that took place on August 10th 2013. Whether or not the oral statements made by Ms. Shelley to Ms. Marini are representative of the Companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s position depends on the how best the plaintiff invokes the principle of agency because the defence is likely to dispute the fact that that conversation was binding to the company.An agent is a person who affects the legal position of another called the principal in transactions with a third party. By express agreement, being an employee of the company, Ms. Shelley is an agent of Workplace Safety Australia. What would be greatly contested however is whether the agent had the requisite authority to transact on behalf of the company. In absence of any actual authority to offer a waiver of application of the sales target clause, it would be hard rely on the statements made by the agent in court.[Chitty, J., Beale, H. G. Chitty on contracts (Sweet Maxwell, 2012) 321] But the plaintiff might rely on the doctrine of apparent or ostensible authority. This concept applies to protect third parties from unscrupulous representations by persons perceived as agents. It may even arise where there has never been an agency relati onship but the principle has conducted himself in a manner suggesting that the agent has authority to transact on its behalf. In the case of Spiro v Lintern it was expressed that with respect to ostensible authority, authority can apply retrospectively. Therefore, because the plaintiff honestly relied on statements of Ms. Shelley knowing that she was an agent of Workplace Safety Australia, with full authority to negotiate, these statements merit to be relied upon in a court of law.[[1973]3 AELR 139.] Whether termination of the contract was unlawfulThere are a number of issues in the facts of this case that clearly affect WSAà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s right to repudiate the contract. Here is an evaluation of the legal principles which can be argued out to challenge the actions of the company.MisrepresentationA misrepresentation is a statement which induces a person to enter into a contract misleadingly. The strongest ground upon which Simple Company can have a legitimate claim is insisting that th ey entered into the agreement only because they relied on the representation of Ms. Shelley. For a suit in misrepresentation to succeed, the representation in question must have been made by the party who is being sued or by his agents and the recipient of that representation must have relied upon it such that it induced him to enter the contract. All that has to be proven is the propensity of the representee to have relied upon the statements and the fact that it indeed relied on the statements and entered into the contract. The burden of proof of proof always lies on the person alleging misrepresentation.[Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459.] Ideally, the norm is that misrepresentation is always invoked by the defendant to escape liability in a suit. However, in this situation the plaintiff is relying upon it to found an action against the representor of that statement. Since the contract has already been rescinded, the remedies available to the plaintiff are limited. There fore, the plaintiff can implore the court to quash the rescission of the contract by the defence if indeed it had performed a substantial amount of the contract. The contract can thus be reinstated and obligations will still subsist. However, if this is not possible, Simple Company is at liberty to institute an independent suit claiming damages in an action for deceit as illustrated in the case of Derry v Peek. The company can also sustain a common law for negligence in common law if it can prove that there existed a duty of care between it and the representor.[(1889) LR 14 App Cas 337.] The import of the principle of misrepresentation implies that the party complicit of misrepresentation cannot have the liberty to repudiate the contract. The aggrieved party is the one which may choose to end the contract. Therefore, if the plaintiff proves successfully that indeed WSA Company misrepresented the terms of the contract, the court will definitely rule that it had no right to terminate the contract.Promissory EstoppelAnother line of argument that is open to Simple OHS Company in dispute of termination is that of Promissory Estoppel. Promissory estoppel requires that if a person makes an unequivocal promise which he expects the promisee to rely on and then later changes the position due to reliance on the promise, then that injustice can only be averted by enforcing the promise. The principle was first brought out in the case of Olson v Synergistic Technologies Business Systems Inc. in which the Chancery court of Equity introduced the underlying requirements that have to be met for it to be invoked. Owing to this decision, the principle was received with much trepidation because of the controversy it created through introducing an obligation on a person on the basis of a promise and in a relationship in which consideration is not involved.[628 NW2d 142 (Minn 2001).] However, the current yardstick of ascertaining the existence of promissory estoppel was precisely se t out in the case of Hughes v. Metropolitan Railway Co. In this case, Lord Cairns stated the requirements that would occasion a promisor being estopped. First, there has to have existed a contractual relationship between the two. Then, the promisor must make it clear that he will not enforce his legal rights. Owing to this promise, the promise must prove reliance upon it. Finally, the court has to be satisfied that it would be inequitable for the promisor to go back from his promise. The position in Hughes was further reaffirmed by Lord Denning in Central London Property Trust Ltd V High Trees House Ltd, when he tried to find an amicable solution to part payment of a debt. This decision was a deviation from the earlier stance taken by Foakes v Beer.[(1887)2 Appeal Cases.] [Between the promisor and promise.] [But this promise must not be express. It may be implied.] [[1947]KB 130.] [[1884]UKHL... Legal Opinion Research Paper - 3025 Words Simple OHS Company v Workplace Safety Australia Pty Ltd (Research Paper Sample) Content: Legal opinionNameInstitutionSimple OHS Company v Workplace Safety Australia Pty LtdLegal OpinionA Brief set of FactsThe dispute at hand arose from the following series of facts. On 23 September 2013, an agreement was entered into between Workplace Safety Australia Pty Limited and Simple OHS Solutions Pty Ltd. The subject of the agreement was that, Simple was tasked to be the distributor of OHS compliance software license in Victoria and Tasmania. Under the said agreement, there clause 5.4 schedule 1 and 2 required Simple company to provide at least fifteen new customers every month for the 6 month duration failure to which would leave the option of termination at the behest of the supplier.However, in light of this agreement, prior to execution of the agreement, Ms. Shelley, an official representative of Workplace Safety Australia Ltd suggested to MS. Marini, a correspondent from Simple Company that she understood that in the startup process it would be hard to meet sales targets and that WSA would not expect them to meet the obligation in the initial stages of the agreement. Despite there being no finite time attached to this statement, on 26th March 2014, WSA sent a letter of termination to Simple Company.Whether Simple can rely on MS. Shelleyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s StatementOral ContractFor the oral statements or negotiations to form a cornerstone of this suit, they have to be admissible in court. Under Common law, the general rule is that once a contract has been reduced into writing, then oral evidence cannot be admitted to add, alter or make a contradiction to the written document. Therefore, the only terms of then contract permissible are those within the four corners of the document. However, this rule is not absolute. It could be circumvented if it is proven that the following circumstances apply.[Whincup, M. H. Contract law and practice: The English system, with Scottish, Commonwealth, and Continental comparisons. (Kluwer Law International, 2006 ) 162.] [McKendrick, E. Contract law: Text, cases, and materials. (Oxford University Press, 2010) 227.] 1 If not all the terms have been reduced to writing as agreed by the two parties 2 When the validity of the contract has been challenged. This happens if there is presence of vitiating elements of a contract such as misrepresentation, fraud, illegality, mistake or lack of consideration 3 If the contract is silent on a concept for which oral evidence would suitably fill the gap. In this case oral evidence may not contradict whatever is in written form but instead supplement it. 4 In contracts where there is no condition subsequent 5 If the courts would like to know more information about the meaning of various usages.From the above concept, it would be plausible to invoke argument (1) and (2) to support the admission of the oral conversation between Ms. Shelley and Ms. Marini. This is because, Simple Company can safely argue that the option of not enforcing the clause at the start of the contract was inadvertently omitted from the final document even though it merited being included. In the second sense, as we shall see later, the existence of this contract will be put into question considering that it can be successfully argued that the contract was only entered into pursuant to a misrepresentation by Workplace Safety Australia Company.In as much as Simple Company concedes that it never met the sales targets for a period of six months, it further contests the actions of Workplace Safety Australia to terminate the contract. In a bid to establish whether Simple OHS Solutions might have a legitimate claim in court to support their actions a number of issues have to be evaluated.Agency RelationshipThe substratum of any suit filed by Simple Company will always be the conversation that took place on August 10th 2013. Whether or not the oral statements made by Ms. Shelley to Ms. Marini are representative of the Companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s position depends on the how best the plaintiff invokes the principle of agency because the defence is likely to dispute the fact that that conversation was binding to the company.An agent is a person who affects the legal position of another called the principal in transactions with a third party. By express agreement, being an employee of the company, Ms. Shelley is an agent of Workplace Safety Australia. What would be greatly contested however is whether the agent had the requisite authority to transact on behalf of the company. In absence of any actual authority to offer a waiver of application of the sales target clause, it would be hard rely on the statements made by the agent in court.[Chitty, J., Beale, H. G. Chitty on contracts (Sweet Maxwell, 2012) 321] But the plaintiff might rely on the doctrine of apparent or ostensible authority. This concept applies to protect third parties from unscrupulous representations by persons perceived as agents. It may even arise where there has never been an agency relati onship but the principle has conducted himself in a manner suggesting that the agent has authority to transact on its behalf. In the case of Spiro v Lintern it was expressed that with respect to ostensible authority, authority can apply retrospectively. Therefore, because the plaintiff honestly relied on statements of Ms. Shelley knowing that she was an agent of Workplace Safety Australia, with full authority to negotiate, these statements merit to be relied upon in a court of law.[[1973]3 AELR 139.] Whether termination of the contract was unlawfulThere are a number of issues in the facts of this case that clearly affect WSAà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s right to repudiate the contract. Here is an evaluation of the legal principles which can be argued out to challenge the actions of the company.MisrepresentationA misrepresentation is a statement which induces a person to enter into a contract misleadingly. The strongest ground upon which Simple Company can have a legitimate claim is insisting that th ey entered into the agreement only because they relied on the representation of Ms. Shelley. For a suit in misrepresentation to succeed, the representation in question must have been made by the party who is being sued or by his agents and the recipient of that representation must have relied upon it such that it induced him to enter the contract. All that has to be proven is the propensity of the representee to have relied upon the statements and the fact that it indeed relied on the statements and entered into the contract. The burden of proof of proof always lies on the person alleging misrepresentation.[Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459.] Ideally, the norm is that misrepresentation is always invoked by the defendant to escape liability in a suit. However, in this situation the plaintiff is relying upon it to found an action against the representor of that statement. Since the contract has already been rescinded, the remedies available to the plaintiff are limited. There fore, the plaintiff can implore the court to quash the rescission of the contract by the defence if indeed it had performed a substantial amount of the contract. The contract can thus be reinstated and obligations will still subsist. However, if this is not possible, Simple Company is at liberty to institute an independent suit claiming damages in an action for deceit as illustrated in the case of Derry v Peek. The company can also sustain a common law for negligence in common law if it can prove that there existed a duty of care between it and the representor.[(1889) LR 14 App Cas 337.] The import of the principle of misrepresentation implies that the party complicit of misrepresentation cannot have the liberty to repudiate the contract. The aggrieved party is the one which may choose to end the contract. Therefore, if the plaintiff proves successfully that indeed WSA Company misrepresented the terms of the contract, the court will definitely rule that it had no right to terminate the contract.Promissory EstoppelAnother line of argument that is open to Simple OHS Company in dispute of termination is that of Promissory Estoppel. Promissory estoppel requires that if a person makes an unequivocal promise which he expects the promisee to rely on and then later changes the position due to reliance on the promise, then that injustice can only be averted by enforcing the promise. The principle was first brought out in the case of Olson v Synergistic Technologies Business Systems Inc. in which the Chancery court of Equity introduced the underlying requirements that have to be met for it to be invoked. Owing to this decision, the principle was received with much trepidation because of the controversy it created through introducing an obligation on a person on the basis of a promise and in a relationship in which consideration is not involved.[628 NW2d 142 (Minn 2001).] However, the current yardstick of ascertaining the existence of promissory estoppel was precisely se t out in the case of Hughes v. Metropolitan Railway Co. In this case, Lord Cairns stated the requirements that would occasion a promisor being estopped. First, there has to have existed a contractual relationship between the two. Then, the promisor must make it clear that he will not enforce his legal rights. Owing to this promise, the promise must prove reliance upon it. Finally, the court has to be satisfied that it would be inequitable for the promisor to go back from his promise. The position in Hughes was further reaffirmed by Lord Denning in Central London Property Trust Ltd V High Trees House Ltd, when he tried to find an amicable solution to part payment of a debt. This decision was a deviation from the earlier stance taken by Foakes v Beer.[(1887)2 Appeal Cases.] [Between the promisor and promise.] [But this promise must not be express. It may be implied.] [[1947]KB 130.] [[1884]UKHL...

Nursing Entrance Essay Examples

<h1>Nursing Entrance Essay Examples</h1><p>Nursing passage exposition tests are generally given to colleges by pre-prescription schools. A considerable lot of the projects that require a passageway paper test will initially check your experience and scholastics. It is generally accepted that a large number of the inquiries posed as of now are genuinely standard, however there are some clinical schools which really center in around your composing aptitudes too. Similarly as with some other application, your exposition tests will be founded on an assortment of variables, for example, grades, execution on a placement test, explore data, and individual details.</p><p></p><p>A great approach to begin is to perceive what different schools offer you. You should visit the school, be acquainted with a portion of the personnel, and see what different understudies need to state about their composing tests. Now, the feeling that an employee establishes i s normally the primary connection you'll get, so consistently contemplate that. Additionally, inquire as to whether you can take the examples home with you. Numerous employees like to give them out as keepsakes of your visit.</p><p></p><p>If you don't satisfy the guideline for a passage paper test, a large number of the schools that don't utilize this test for affirmation will cause you to compose a similar article with an alternate title. This is particularly valid for green bean or students from other schools. In spite of the fact that these two gatherings have comparative needs, their educators might have the option to pull off somewhat less requesting essays.</p><p></p><p>It is imperative to comprehend that the exposition for induction into nursing programs is normally very long, and could be the most troublesome of a wide range of uses. Most schools will request in any event 250 words by and large. In any case, you should attempt to be unique with your substance. Your exposition can likewise be short and direct.</p><p></p><p>Most universities will request that you compose a general article for green beans, and afterward on the off chance that you need to take entrance tests in later years, they will probably catch up with a particular subject for these classes. Despite the fact that these kinds of article tests normally contrast little from each other, recall that these tests should have obvious bearings. For instance, a particular subject for Freshman confirmation is ponder the primary year in school. For students from other schools, the principle contrast would be that they would focus on their clinical vocations and can be substantially more adaptable in their topics.</p><p></p><p>It is additionally conceivable to get composing tests of others' expositions, yet the least demanding approach to get this is apply to nursing schools. While you will presumably ne ed to give some example paper work to their entrance advisory board, you will locate that a significant number of different schools will send their own example articles alongside the application bundle. Remember that the entirety of the composing tests are composed to accomplish a similar reason, which is to deliver a cognizant section that gives the peruser a feeling of your style.</p><p></p><p>In expansion to helping clinical establishments with their enlistment choice, affirmation expositions can likewise be an incredible method to win grant cash. Clinical schools normally consider the accompanying properties in a candidate: scholastic accomplishments, extracurricular exercises, initiative capacities, and network inclusion. Most grant projects will require a base evaluation point normal and will likewise search for whether you are taking the selection test and have finished the necessary number of hours for that particular class. They may likewise consider whether you have shown you possess enough free energy for contemplating, just as your test scores.</p><p></p><p>Overall, the nursing passage exposition test might be your most solid option for getting yourself took note. It is normally done, and by and large mirrors the abilities and character that you are attempting to depict. There are a couple of preferences to composing a paper like this also, for example, the way that you can practice and adjust the style, just as the way that it doesn't take extremely long to compose and is a ton of fun.</p>